The Problem with the Men's Rights Movement

As a necessary counterweight to the excessesdon't believe me), but on the other hand there
of the women's rights movement, a men's rightare men (and women) out there who are
movement has developed to fight for equity inphysically abusive and could care less about that
the courts, in the family and in the workplace. Forpiece of paper a court order is written on. People
instance, in divorces there is significant andgo to the system for help and they don't get the
insurmountable (unless you have lots of money)help they need. We can all agree that no innocent
obstacles to getting a fair custody decisionwoman or man should not be protected against
regarding your children. Restraining orders arean abuser. Surely there is some middle ground to
given away easily and have been used asaddress both sides.
weapons in divorce cases even when there is noTherein lies the difficulty. Activist groups, if they
evidence of abuse. There clearly is a need to stopwant even an ounce of press or public pressure,
the abuse men suffer from the excesses of themust adopt from the start that the other side is
women's rights movement.evil and wants to screw the innocent.
The problem with the movement, which is theCompromise is not only difficult, it's impossible. All
same problem with the women's rightsthese groups then rank legislators on their
movement, is that adoption of the victim-enemyabsolute compliance with their agenda. Any
moniker that the press imposes on every issue.leeway on their part makes them unacceptable.
Anyone who does marketing for television will tellSo things have settled into a nice little
you this is the format to present any issue if youdétente where the men's rights and
want news coverage: one, pick a victim and tell awomen's rights movements resort to outright
sob story. This victim must be presented asname-calling instead of reasoned debate to
angelic, an innocent victim of a cruel and obstinateimprove the status of all people. With some
system without regard for truth. Two, find aissues, such rhetoric is not a big deal. In this case,
villain. This villain is the epitome of moral evil andwe are dealing with families where peace should
must be destroyed. For many issues, referring toreign. Instead we have dueling groups that wage
George W. Bush suffices (which is why politicaltheir war and leave the family asunder. Families
discourse in this country is so worthless).are the building block of society, and as goes the
Villains cannot be compromised with, they mustfamily, so goes society.
be defeated. They are the bad guys and weIt may be tempting for the men's rights
need to stick up for the good guys at all costs.movement to say "let's not compromise until
The problem is that compromise becomesthey do", but even from a political standpoint, if it
unthinkable and even seeing the legitimate pointsis an all-or-nothing fight the women's groups have
of view of the other side is out of the question.more clout and that is that. Adopting a more
To see this play out, see any political debateholistic approach is also a political necessity if they
show talking about the election.don't want to be side-lined.
While there are significant injustices the menIt is long past time for policy makers and policy
suffer as documented in Steven Baskerville's fineadvocates to drop the all-or-none attitude and
book Taken Into Custody, there are injusticesstart to find a middle ground to find beneficial
that women have and still do suffer also.policies for what is best for the entire family. In
Retraining orders are far too easy to get withoutan all-or-nothing fight, one side may win, but in the
any evidence whatsoever (go ahead and sit in aend we all lose.
courtroom and watch a hearing for one if you