The Effects of Sub-prime Lending in the US

In recent years it has been easier to get a loanThis all had a big effect on the American stock
or credit to fund a new car or whatever else youmarket which in turn negatively influenced
fancied. But now it's all changed and times areeconomies around the world. The banks suddenly
definitely harder. The change started when thedid not want to lend money any more to anyone
number of repossession of homes in the USthat could be considered higher risk and heavy
suddenly started to rise during autumn 2006. Thelending restrictions were put in place. This has
effect of this has had a knock on effect acrosstransferred over to the UK where the number of
the world and sparked a global financial crisis inhouse repossession in the last year has also risen.
2007.However sub-prime lender in the UK accounts for
The crisis came about when people in the Statesonly 6% of all lending where as in the US it
started to default on mortgage payments thataccounts for 20%. Despite this there have been
they could no longer afford. Due to the relativelyheavy crackdowns who is eligible to be lent
high level of prosperity banks had been lendingmoney.
money to people who had poor credit historiesThe banks are in part to blame for this crisis, with
and were considered high risk. In order tothe Financial Services Authority (FSA) taking
minimise the risk banks, charged higher interestaction against 5 brokers, after their review of the
rates for these loans to ensure that they wouldmortgage market last year. In addition the FSA
get the cash back. Borrowers began realising thatfound out of the 34 brokers they monitored one
lenders were open to them, and were enticed bythird failed to properly assess if the consumer
the rise in housing prices, so took out a mortgagecould actually afford the loan. Consumers were
to get on the property ladder. However inbeing asked to fill out self certification forms
2006-2007 housing prices in the US started to fallstating their income, but no further checks were
which has lead to a difficulty in re-financing homesmade to validate these figures. Consumers
for more favourable rates. People were thereforewanting to borrow more money to keep up with
stuck with expensive mortgages that they justthe ever increasing prices of the house market
could not sustain over the long term.may be tempted to inflate their earnings just to
Mortgage defaults were quickly responded to withget on the ladder without thinking about the
repossessions, and people started to lose theirconsequences.
homes. By October 2007 the rates ofThe situation we have now been left with in the
repossessions were three times higher than theUK does look bleak. Mortgages are harder to
number in the same month of 2005. By Januaryobtain and have higher rates, however this may
2008 this had risen even steeper by another 5%.prompt a slowdown in house prices rising which
During the whole of 2007 1.3 million homes in thewould help more people actually be able to afford
US were repossessed, leaving the banks with atheir own home.
deficiency of between $200 and 300 billion dollars.