Should the US Intervene in the Internal Affairs of Other Countries?

It is simpler if we view this question in terms ofhighest unemployment rates, highest number of
an individual. On March 17th, 2008, I celebrated 30alcohol and drug statistics, lowest life expectancy
years of being clean and sober.rate, (Natives die 11 years sooner than whites),
In working with individuals who express interest inand Natives suffer diabetes at twice the national
sobriety, I have learned that you can't solveaverage.
another person's problems, at "any" level. We canNot only does this example show the United
encourage them, provide suggestions, and shareStates inability to "help" other countries, it also
our experience, but in the last analysis, theshows the devastating effects of socialism on a
individual must make the decision to do the worknation and its peoples, yet policies are still be
necessary for sobriety. The same holds true ofwritten and monies being spent on socialistic goals.
nations. Throwing money at a problem, whetherHillary Clinton even proposed to give all children
at the personal level or national level does nothingborn in the United States $500.00 at birth. Where
but create a "something" for "nothing" mentalitywas/is this money coming from?
and also interferes with their growth as a personI am going to include a quote by a Frenchman
and as a nation.written by Frederic Bastiat, a French economist in
Freedom can not be "given". Freedom can only bethe 1840's. He foresaw the issues facing America
earned. Its by earning freedom do we learn howwhen a Government adopts socialism as America
to maintain it, just like sobriety.has done the last 70 years. He maintains:
The Bible tells us to worry about the "beam" in"[The socialists declare] that the state owes
our eye, before we worry about the "speck" insubsistence, well-being, and education to all its
another persons eye. The United States cannotcitizens; that it should be generous, charitable,
solve its own problems much less that take oninvolved in everything, devoted to
other countries problems. Our "War" on Povertyeverybody;...that it should intervene directly to
has been going on since the 60's. The same holdsrelieve all suffering, satisfy and anticipate all wants,
true of the "War" on Drugs. As we know, afterfurnish capital to all enterprises, enlightenment to
billion's of dollars spent, drugs are still rampant inall minds, balm for all wounds, asylums for all the
our society. We are not winning these wars.unfortunate, and even aid to the point of shedding
Our jails are filled to the brim with inmates. InFrench blood, for all oppressed people on the face
Oregon, we spend more dollars on jails than weof the earth.
do on education.Who would not like to see all these benefits flow
In reality, the money we spend overseas areforth upon the world from the law, as from an
mainly bribes. It is a way for the United States toinexhaustible source?...But is it possible?...Whence
exert influence in areas we do not and should bedoes [the state] draw those resources that it is
involved in. It is little wonder America is viewed asurged to dispense by way of benefits to
a threat rather than ally.individuals? Is it not from the individuals
We have another saying in recovery. We arethemselves? How, then, can these resources be
encouraged to apply the principles contained in ourincreased by passing through the hands of a
Big Book because, "we maybe the only Big Bookparasitical and voracious intermediary?...
somebody sees". This means that we areFinally...we shall see the entire people transformed
encouraged to be "examples" of sobriety, ratherinto petitioners. Landed property, agriculture,
than going out and strong arming individuals intoindustry, commerce, shipping, industrial companies,
sobriety.all will bestir themselves to claim favors from the
This same principle holds true for the Unitedstate. The public treasury will be literally pillaged.
States. We need to apply the principles of theEveryone will have good reasons to prove that
Constitution, of capitalism, of our Foundinglegal fraternity should be interpreted in this sense:
Fathers, of Liberty, of Individual Rights and by so"Let me have the benefits, and let others pay the
doing, we will be examples to the world of whatcosts."
"can" be accomplished.Everyone's effort will be directed toward
The old saying of, "give a man a fish and yousnatching a scrap of fraternal privilege from the
feed him for a day, but teach him how to fishlegislature. The suffering classes, although having
and you feed him for a lifetime", applies to thisthe greatest claim, will not always have the
question. We have trying to feed other countriesgreatest success.";from Journal des Economistes
for many years now, and they still can't fish. WeAs you can see from the above quote, American
have been doing so here in the United States withhas bought the idea that the "government" can
our own citizens and we have whole generationsand should solve, not only "our" problems, but the
who are welfare families, and who cannot or will"worlds" problem also. As is evidenced by the
not learn how to fish for themselves.millions of people, organizations, funding agencies,
If I was still drunk, would others believe me whenprivate individuals and companies, who continually
I told them how to stay sober? The same holdspetition for money, we have proved Frederic
true for the United States. How can we tell themBastiat prediction. We have become a nation of
how to eliminate racism? Or how to feed their"petitioners" all claiming favors from the
people when we have people starving? When thegovernment, who want "others" to pay the cost.
United States violates human rights and liberties,Now imagine if our politicians and our bureaucrats
for "any" reason, how can we hold ourselves updecide that America should solve the worlds
as defenders of liberty?problems? Who pays for it? You? Me? Our
Politicians in the United States have been actingchildren and grandchildren? When does it stop?
like a drunken sailor on leave with a pocket full ofI am always amazed when politicians want to
money. For many years now they havesolidify and expand their base, when they want
mis-spent tax dollars by spending it on activitiesmore access to tax dollars, and more influence to
that the average U.S. citizen would not support.peddle, they always appeal to American's sense
Native American's here in the United States haveof duty and guilt. Native American's call it
learned to run like hell when a government"white-guilt". They, like other races and minorities,
worker shows up and tells them they are here tohave learned how to manipulate that guilt to their
"help" them! If you truly want to see evidence ofown detriment.
the United States inability to "help" other countries,No, we can't solve our own problems, much less
just look at the state of Native Americanthose of other countries. Let us lead by example
reservations. After 200 years of being "helped"rather than by misusing money and influence.
by the United States, reservations still have the