Freakonomics - A Rogue Economist by Steven D Levitt and Stephen J Dubner

This is one extremely entertaining book which willThere are problems with the book as well, as the
seem like an intellectual adventure for you (theearlier part of the book is very fast moving and a
book is not without its problems, but we canfun read. After that, it's more of an attempt to
safely ignore those). The author, Steven D. Levitt,create a longer version of the book. The
is great at questioning conventional wisdoms. Atarguments put forward are tight, but not
the same time, he takes the help of traditionalcomprehensive enough, and other points of view
tools he learned while studying economics to findhave been simply brushed aside. The authors say
answers to these very questions he is asking.the crime rate has declined due to the decision
The way he answers these questions istaken by Roe v Wade, but only national factors
interesting and engaging, and that's precisely thehave been analyzed in this piece. It would have
reason the readers feel captivated the momentbeen great if the author had compared the data
they start reading.of various cities and could have taken into
Provocative, Interesting and Reasoned Answersaccount the crime data disparities across various
The answers to his own questions as developedregions.
by Steven D. Levitt are provocative, interestingNo Grey Areas... Just One Right Answer
and reasoned at the same time. Your own opinionThe general tendency to provide one right
whether you are ready to pay the money foranswer for the problem is dominant throughout
the book or not, depends on your own perceptionthe book. There is no attempt to provide a deep
of the problems raised by Steven D. Levitt.insight into the problem or complicated factors
Contrary to what the name of the book says,behind it. His conclusions have (in many cases)
the author Steven D. Levitt is not a roguemanaged to offend everyone concerned. In his
economist; he uses the same tools thestudy and conclusions on crime rate, some
conventional economists use, though the book hethought this was an attempt to promote abortion,
writes is very much a mainstream book. He iswhereas the liberals sensed there was some
one of the most respected economists in his ownracism in the arguments. Steven D. Levitt
peer group also.questions the conventional boundaries of thinking,
The Arguments Given Are Tightthat too successfully.