Financial Meltdown: End of the World Delayed? it Appears So

Supposedly the financial world almost collapsed.'Over the last 20 years, the U.S. securities
This lie has much currency. A worldwide writeindustry has learned through experience how to
down of speculative real estate assets andnavigate through financially stressful events that
financial instruments totalling perhaps $1 Trillion orcan damage confidence,'' Hintz, a former Lehman
a mere 2% of the world's economy, wasfinance chief, said...'”
Armaggedon [an ancient hebrew word that hasIn other words, the markets are perfectly
nothing to do with the world's demise].capable to respond to changing market conditions
Government created problems – forcingand asset re-pricing. If Bears went bankrupt the
banks to lend to people with no proof of income;system and the world would not have ended. It
cheap interest rates for too long; and a flood ofwould have been the same as Drexel Burnham's
money – is now blamed on 'markets'. Howbankruptcy in the early 90s, the valuable pieces
ridiculous. Governments and politicians create thewould have been picked up by competitors and
problem, then come in to 'fix it'. It is laughable.life would have continued.
The 'housing crisis' so overblown and exagerrated,This is not to deny that problems exist in the
had no chance to destroy the financial system,financial world. But the main problem is not a lack
the world's trading system or 'capitalism'. It is aof regulation – there are thousands of
remarkably minor episode in financial terms withregulatory statutes in the financial world which are
far less than a Trillion dollars being the realnever used, or invoked. None of these
damage of government inspired speculation andbureaucratic minions were using their existing
land rush lunacy. In fact the major banks andpowers to prevent loans to people with no
investment houses are already releasingincome verification for example. We don't need
statements that their write-downs over themore arcane rules and costly fees and yet more
coming years, will be written-up, in other wordsbureaucrats. We need transparency, less
they have taken too many losses and the valuegovernment involvement and smarter, lighter
of the underlying assets is worth more than firstregulation. The main problem is of course
thought.government and its constant regulatory –
How exagerrated is this 'crisis' ? Consider thepolitical meddling.
following:Way back in the good old days of Jimmy Carter
-Goldman Sachs' estimate of total world widein 1977, the American political class created a law
mortgage or housing and related financialtermed 'The Community Reinvestment Act' [how
instruments write-offs: $1.2 Trillionsick and Orwellian does that sound?], which
-Market capitalisation of major banks and financemandated that a certain percentage of bank loans
houses listed on New York Stock Exchange : $16and mortgages MUST be given to undocumented
Trillion or 15 times the total write-offs related toborrowers who did not need to show proof of
the housing mess.income or assets. The political idea was to force
-Total bond market liquidity worldwide: $45 Trillionbanks to create more homeowners amongst
-Liquidity available in derivatives worldwide: $300minorities and the poor [you know end white
Trillionracism etc. etc.] and thereby stabilise the lower
-State managed sovereign funds capital: $25classes of US society and energise community
Trillionand economic growth. But such decrees by
-Liquid cash on hand in Wall Street's top 4government don't work and in fact they distort
investment banks ONLY: $200 Billionmarkets dramatically.
-US total GDP: $13.5 TrillionWhat happens when government distorts
-World Wide GDP: $45 Trillionmarkets by making dumb anti-reality laws? You
-Total stock market value worldwide of allcreate asset bubbles which at some point in time
exchanges: $85 Trillionwill deflate.
-Excess cash on hand at the Federal Reserve,The CRA stimulated speculation; over-buying by
undeployed: $400 Billionun-qualified borrowers and ultimately of course,
-Income growth in the US in 2007: $500 Billionthe creation of loans which had little value.
An objective observer who looked at thisCombined with low interest rates from 2001 to
situation would say, 'well yes there are some2004; easy money and relaxed credit lending
problems, but there appears to be more thanconditions, the scene was set for a large market
enough money, liquid assets, and real assets toprice correction. Yet market priced corrections
back up the financial markets'. Indeed. The realitycan be positive. Now US homebuyers can
is that the extreme estimate of $1.2 Trillion inpurchase valuable assets at reduced prices with
write-offs over the 'mortgage crisis' is really areasonable interest rates on a variety of loan and
pittance. It is 7% of Bank market capitalisation onmortgage vehicles. The market in other words is
Wall Street as of March 31 2008; it is 2 % ofclearing the over supply of housing stock at
world-wide GDP and the bond market; it is 2rational market rates.
years of income growth; and it is 1% of theSo what does government want to do? After
world's stock market capitalisation. Yes $1.2 Trillioncausing the problem in the first place, they want
is a significant amount of money, but is it the endto create yet more regulation; more fees; more
of the world?distortions and in the future, more trouble. It is
Of course not.nothing more than populist and retarded politics
The idea behind the current savage round ofand circular irrational reasoning: 'we created a crisis
market- hating, is the idea that if Bear Stearnswith government incompetence; there are
the 5th largest US investment bank wentproblems which need addressing; the voting
bankrupt, the entire system would collapse.population expects action; ergo we will do more
Rubbish. Every 5 years a major bank orof what caused the problem in the first place.'
investment house goes bust, and the systemThis is a definition of insanity.
carries on just fine. Bear Stearns was a badlyThe financial system does have problems and
managed entity who did not understand whatissues, but the market can work them out. The
was on its balance sheet. It was levered 34:1,'crisis' is completely exagerrated and over-blown.
debt to equity. Thankfully Bear Stearns has noBy any measure the write-offs are minor, and
correlation to the balance sheets or strengths ofthe impact on the overall system, while strong, is
its fomer competitors:not overpowering. There is enough liquidity, central
“Lehman's liquid assets are more than fivebank support, and financial strength to easily
times greater than its shareholders' equity. Atovercome the government created asset bubble
Merrill Lynch & Co., the world's largest broker, andin real estate.
Morgan Stanley, the second-biggest U.S. securitiesToo bad the politicians and the bureaucrats won't
firm, the ratio is three times equity. Goldman'sadmit that.
liquid assets are double its equity......