Can One Place Plato's Allegory to Be Accurate?

The allegory of the cave is a story from theAssume, for sake of argument, that Plato is
book 'the republic' written by Plato, in it consistscorrect. How can the study of philosophy help
of two characters the Socrates who is aremedy this situation?
philosopher and his young follower named Glaucon.Assuming Plato is correct is assuming that to
He explains to him that human beings are ignorantattain the status of being able to see the truth,
with the knowledge of knowing only what theyyou have to be able to see past the shadows on
have been told, and in the quest to know thethe wall and realize that you can turn your head
truth, when faced with a little challenge they backto the minds reality and see that there is more to
out, in the sense that they go back to theirthe truth of being then what you can physically
ignorance. The Allegory of the Cave can besee with your own two eyes. In other words the
interpreted in many ways; one way is to make astudy of philosophical means enabling our minds to
comparison between the story and the way ofsee the truth about reality. Also, if Plato is
thinking by individuals in a closed society. Socratescorrect, the soul of man inherently contains
states that the cave is a world many of us wouldknowledge of good but can only perceive this in
like to see, but are not really how the world is. Itdegrees of experience until the highest level of
is almost like the movie "The Matrix", where Neo,knowledge is attained. Does it have mathematical
the main character is to discover that the worldmeaning, explain a vision of the whole world, or is
he lives in is not the real world, but a worldit just a comparison to the field of social work? I
generated by machines and computers. Only inpersonally feel that "The Allegory of the
Socrates' allegory, the world is not created byCave¨ is a great explanation of how people in
computers, but by individual minds. Socratesthe world live. People are just like the men
wants Glaucon to be a wiser, better-educatedchained inside the cave, people only know and
man, who will later become a ruler of the State.believe what he or she might have seen.
He wants him to know not only the right, but alsoWell religion has to do with the study of the
experience the wrong, because only a man, whonature of religion and religious beliefs. During the
knows the bad, can truly understand andlife time of Plato he said wonder was the
appreciate the good. Socrates does this by tellingbeginning of philosophy and religious philosophy
him a story, to let him better understand thecame as a result of wonder. It was also
principles of life.contemplated through thoughts in which the things
He illustrated what he meant by an example heof time participate. Before the theory of the
gave saying the prisoners in a cave from theirallegory of the cave, Plato said there is something
childhood whose limbs and heads have beenabove called "essential form of good". Plato had
chained, will see their shadows reflected by a raymany ideas on how one's mind, body, and spirit
of light from an opening as other people andcame together to perform actions and thoughts.
when they hear the echo of their voices, theyOne important idea he broke down, was the
think it is the people they see talking. And if oneconception of the soul in "Allegory of the Cave".
of them is released, when he realizes that all heHe broke this idea into three different parts and
saw was an illusion he will definitely take what heeach of these parts played a role in the feelings
has believed in since childhood until he is forciblyof man. These parts were referred to as the sun,
dragged on to see the real thing then he'll comethe line, and the cave.
up with certain theories. And a personalThe sun symbolized the Form of the Good; the
understanding of his illustration is him using theultimate object of knowledge, according to Plato.
cave as the world, and the shadows cast on theThe prisoners in the cave looked at nothing but
wall are the particular things of the world. The fireshadows on a wall from the statues which was
in the cave is the sun. Outside the cave is themade to make them believe that the shadows
world of ideas. The prisoners who can only seeare the most real things that are in the world. In
shadows are non-philosophers who can only knoworder to reach the Form of the Good, you must
the individual things of the world which are onlybe able to see what's real, resulting in a prisoner's
shadows of the essential things. The prisoner whorelease to the outside world.
escapes and goes outside the world is aThe prisoner released is now able to look at the
philosopher who rises above this world of sensesfire and the statues, but is in disbelief that the
and goes into the intelligible world, the ideal world.shadows are not the most real things in the world.
The chains on the prisoners are passions,This is where the line comes in. The line
prejudices, and sophistries.represents the four stages of cognitive activity
The metaphysics which deals with the essence ofthat a human being is capable of doing. The
being and the study of ultimate reality is explainedprisoner now believes that the fire and the
with the idea of the released prisoner seeing whatstatues are the most real things in the world.
is reality deals with the metaphysics and alsoAfter the prisoner is dragged into the outside
where he is able to discover the sunlight andworld, he sees real objects. The cave illustrates
other earthly bodies was the metaphysicalthe effects that education has on a human being.
knowledge of plat the writer and Socrates theThe prisoner doesn't have to imagine what real
story teller. We are all prisoners watchingthings are because he now knows what the most
shadows in a cave this metaphor contains areal things in the outside world are. He sees real
puzzle. The specific platonic form of thetrees, real flowers, and even the sun, which he
philosophical predicament of attempting to saylearns is the cause of the real objects being seen.
that if we are prisoners in the cave watchingThe Allegory of the Cave is a process of the
shadows, how could we have known that this isgrowing mind. We grow from imagination, to
the case? If we only have experience of thebelief, to forms, and finally, we grow to
shadow world, how can we come to see how itunderstanding. This is the closest thing in Plato to
really is? They would think the things they see ontraditional conceptions of God.
the wall (the shadows) were real; they wouldPlato's aim in the Republic is to describe what is
know nothing of the real causes of the shadows.necessary for us to achieve this reflective
So when the prisoners talk, what are they talkingunderstanding. But even without it, it remains true
about? If an object (a book let us say) is carriedthat our very ability to think and to speak
past behind them, and it casts a shadow on thedepends on the Forms. For the terms of the
wall, and a prisoner says "I see a book," what islanguage we use get their meaning by "naming"
he talking about? He thinks he is talking about athe Forms that the objects we perceive
book, but he is really talking about a shadow. Butparticipate in. The prisoners may learn what a
he uses the word "book." What does that referbook is by their experience with shadows of
to? Plato gives his answer at line (515b2). Thebooks. But they would be mistaken if they
text here has puzzled many editors, and it hasthought that the word "book" refers to something
been frequently emended. The translation inthat any of them has ever seen. Likewise, we
Gruber/Reeve gets the point correctly:may acquire concepts by our perceptual
"And if they could talk to one another, don't youexperience of physical objects. But we would be
think they'd suppose that the names they usedmistaken if we thought that the concepts that
applied to the things they see passing beforewe grasp were on the same level as the things
them?"we perceive. This hereby explains the saying of
Plato's point is that the prisoners would beman's nature seeing is believing as Plato believes
mistaken for they would be taking the terms inthat what you see is inferior to what you believe
their language to refer to the shadows that passwhich explains the fact that the eternal holds
before their eyes, rather than (as is correct, inmore hope for the non philosophers than the
Plato's view) to the real things that cast thephysical...
shadows. If a prisoner says "That's a book" hePolitics' focus is on one social institution- the state
thinks that the word "book" refers to the veryand seeks to determine its justification, ethical
thing he is looking at. But he would be wrong. He'scomposition, and organization. And also who should
only looking at a shadow. The real referent of therule, and how best to rule. In the allegory of the
word "book" he cannot see. To see it, he wouldcave, I really don't see any relations to ruling
have to turn his head around. Plato's point is thatexcept that; the people who chain these prisoners
the general terms of our language are notshould let them go so that they can be able to
"names" of the physical objects that we can see.discover the truth. That is the people of this
They are actually names of things that we cannotworld should set free and go in search of the
see, things that we can only grasp with the mind.truth they should become philosophers and be no
But if we are prisoners of a bench watchingmore ignorant of reality and the truth. Plato is of
shadows we take for reality, Plato is also athe view that non-philosophers should have no
prisoner and finds himself watching shadows, soplace in government as they are still in shadows
Plato's description of the cave is just anotherand have no knowledge of the light. He believes
shadow, and if it is a shadow, it cannot also be athat those who should be in power are people in
true description of how things are. And if it is notexperience. A philosopher king should be the one
a true description of how things are then, thento rule. He believed that the unlearned should not
Plato's theory of things not being in true physical ishave any business in government whatsoever as
not the true description as he himself watchesthey will only act on impulse and not with
shadows too. So that could initiate that there is noknowledge. He believed that those who are to
truth.govern must visit the dark after the light so that
The epistemology questions the certainty ofthey can be ten times better than those in the
knowledge, that is whether knowledge is possibledark. He says that;
or not. It deals with such issues as sources,"And you will know what the several images are,
scope, validity and limits of knowledge. Well in theand what they represent, because you have seen
allegory of the cave, we see that the prisonersthe beautiful and just and good in their truth. And
acquired their knowledge through what they saw,thus our State which is also yours will be a reality,
therefore we could tell that it was actually notand not a dream only, and will be administered in
real that it was all illusions; hence we say theira spirit unlike that of other States, in which men
knowledge wasn't valid. Also their knowledge wasfight with one another about shadows only and
limited in the sense that all they knew was whatare distracted in the struggle for power, which in
they had seen in the cage they had not been abletheir eyes is a great good. Whereas the truth is
to explore more in other to acquire a quality widethat the State in which the rulers are most
and valid knowledge. Suppose they were awarereluctant to govern is always the best and most
of the outside world beyond the cave, they wouldquietly governed, and the State in which they are
have sort or search out ways out of the cave asmost eager, the worst."
man's curiosity and search for knowledge is in hisHe believed that the only life which looks down
nature and cannot be denied. However, thatupon the life of political ambition is that of true
search for knowledge was not possible as thephilosophy and that those who govern ought not
cave was seen as the only home in existence andto be lovers of the task for, if they are, there will
thereby they used their physical sense as thebe rival lovers, and they will fight. He believed that
source of their knowledge. Plato maintains thatthose whom they should have as leaders should
true knowledge, is not acquired through sensebe the men who are wisest about affairs of
perception because true knowledge is universal,State, and by whom the State is best
objective and infallible. Hence the object ofadministered, and who at the same time have
knowledge must be stable.other honors and another and a better life than
Plato believes that most people live in mentalthat of politics. Plato was an idealist who believed
caves of ignorance and never perceive the truth.in an ideal state.